WebAR vs Apps: Key Differences, Pros, and Cons

Moody Mattan • February 12, 2025

Augmented reality (AR) is shaking things up and enhancing how we experience things in various industries—whether it’s retail, gaming, education, or marketing. As brands look for fun and creative ways to connect with customers, two exciting technologies are leading the way: WebAR and mobile apps. While both of these options strive to create amazing AR experiences, they have some key differences when it comes to development, accessibility, and user experience. In this article, we’ll break down these differences, share the pros and cons of each approach, and offer some helpful tips to consider when deciding which one might be right for your business or project. Let's dive in!


What is WebAR?


WebAR, short for Web-based Augmented Reality, refers to AR experiences delivered directly through web browsers without requiring users to download a dedicated app. This technology leverages HTML5, WebGL, and other modern web standards to provide interactive AR content. Key characteristics include:



  • Accessibility: Users can access WebAR experiences with just a URL link, making it ideal for campaigns where ease of entry is critical.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility: WebAR works on various devices and operating systems, such as smartphones, tablets, and desktops.
  • Instant Engagement: With no need for installation, WebAR minimizes the friction between curiosity and engagement, leading to potentially higher conversion rates.


Because of its inherent flexibility and ease of use, WebAR is particularly popular in marketing campaigns, educational tools, and interactive product demos.


What are Mobile Apps?


Mobile apps, in contrast, are dedicated software programs designed to run on smartphones and tablets. These apps often incorporate AR functionality through platforms such as ARKit for iOS or ARCore for Android. Key characteristics include:


  • Native Performance: Mobile apps are optimized for performance, delivering smooth, high-quality AR experiences.
  • Enhanced Features: Apps can more effectively leverage native device features like the camera, GPS, and sensors, allowing for sophisticated AR interactions.
  • Offline Capabilities: Once downloaded, many apps offer offline functionalities, which can be a crucial advantage for users in areas with limited internet access.


While apps provide robust capabilities and a polished user experience, they typically require a longer development cycle and demand user commitment to download and install.


Key Differences Between WebAR and Mobile Apps


Understanding the distinct differences between WebAR and mobile apps is crucial for selecting the right technology for your project. Here’s a side-by-side comparison:


Accessibility & Onboarding


  • WebAR:
  • No App Store Hassle: Users simply click on a link to start the experience, eliminating the need to download and install an app.
  • Broader Reach: Easily accessible by anyone with a modern web browser.
  • Instant Interaction: Ideal for campaigns that rely on quick engagement and viral sharing.
  • Mobile Apps:
  • Dedicated Installation: This option requires users to download the app from an app store, which can be a barrier to entry.
  • User Commitment: Apps often need regular updates and permission to use device features.
  • Enhanced Control: Developers can create a more tailored experience with offline capabilities and deeper integrations.


Development Complexity


  • WebAR:
  • Faster Deployment: Developers can quickly create and update AR experiences using web technologies.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility: A single build can work on multiple devices without separate development tracks.
  • Limitations: Although improving, WebAR might not offer the same level of performance or complex interactions as native apps.
  • Mobile Apps:
  • Native Performance: Offers high-performance experiences with advanced graphics and interactions.
  • Platform-Specific Development: Often requires separate development processes for iOS and Android, increasing time and cost.
  • Robust Capabilities: Better access to device-specific features and hardware acceleration can be critical for intensive AR applications.


User Experience & Interaction


  • WebAR:
  • Simplified UX: Designed to be lightweight and fast, focusing on immediate interaction.
  • Browser Limitations: Browsers may not fully utilize a device's hardware potential, sometimes resulting in lower-fidelity experiences.
  • Mobile Apps:
  • Rich Interactivity: Offers a more immersive and high-quality AR experience.
  • Consistent Performance: Leveraging native APIs ensures better performance and smoother animations.
  • User Loyalty: Once downloaded, apps can engage users through push notifications and frequent updates.


Pros and Cons of WebAR


Pros


  1. Ease of Access:
    With WebAR, there is no barrier to entry—users only need a URL and a compatible browser. This simplicity often results in higher user engagement and lower abandonment rates.
  2. Cost-Effective Development:
    Developing AR experiences for the web can be more affordable than building native apps. A single codebase can be deployed across multiple platforms, saving both time and resources.
  3. Instant Updates:
    Changes and improvements can be made on the server side without requiring users to download updates, ensuring that everyone experiences the latest version.
  4. Viral Potential:
    The simplicity of sharing a link via social media or email increases the likelihood of content going viral. Marketers can leverage this to reach a wider audience quickly.
  5. Platform Agnostic:
    WebAR is not restricted to a specific operating system. Users can seamlessly access the experience on iOS, Android, or even a desktop computer.


Cons


  1. Performance Limitations:
    Web-based AR experiences may not deliver the same level of performance or visual fidelity as native apps. Implementing complex animations and high-quality graphics might also be challenging.
  2. Limited Access to Device Features:
    Although browsers are becoming more capable, they still lag behind native apps when it comes to accessing device-specific features like advanced camera controls, sensor data, or augmented hardware acceleration.
  3. Browser Compatibility Issues:
    Not all browsers support the latest AR technologies uniformly, which can lead to inconsistent experiences across devices and platforms.
  4. User Experience Constraints:
    The simplicity of a WebAR experience is both a strength and a weakness. While it’s quick to access, it may not provide the depth or customization that a native app can offer.


Pros and Cons of Mobile Apps


Pros


  1. Superior Performance:
    Native apps are optimized for the device they run on, resulting in smoother animations, more precise tracking, and a more immersive AR experience overall.
  2. Advanced Features:
    Mobile apps have full access to a device’s hardware and software features. This includes high-resolution camera inputs, gyroscopes, GPS, and more—enabling complex AR functionalities that WebAR might struggle to support.
  3. Offline Functionality:
    Unlike WebAR, many mobile apps can operate without a continuous internet connection. This is crucial for users in areas with poor connectivity.
  4. Enhanced User Engagement:
    Apps can send push notifications, offer personalized content, and store user data locally, fostering ongoing engagement and loyalty.
  5. Customizability:
    Developers can tailor the user interface and interactions specifically for the app environment, resulting in a highly customized and branded experience.


Cons


  1. Higher Development Costs:
    Creating native apps often involves separate development for each platform (iOS, Android), which can significantly increase both time and financial investment.
  2. User Onboarding Challenges:
    Many users find the need to download and install an app deterring. This extra step can reduce initial engagement rates compared to instantly accessible WebAR experiences.
  3. Maintenance Overhead:
    Apps require regular updates and maintenance to ensure compatibility with new operating system versions and devices. This ongoing commitment can add to the overall cost.
  4. App Store Dependencies:
    Developers must navigate various app stores' rules and approval processes, which can sometimes delay releases or restrict certain functionalities.
  5. Fragmentation Issues:
    Differences in device capabilities, screen sizes, and operating system versions can lead to inconsistencies in user experience, making it challenging to maintain a uniform quality across all users.


Choosing the Right Technology for Your Project


Deciding between WebAR and mobile apps ultimately depends on your project’s goals, target audience, and budget. Here are some scenarios to consider:


  • For Marketing Campaigns:
    If your primary goal is to drive quick engagement and viral sharing, WebAR may be the better option. Its ease of access and low barrier to entry allow users to interact with your AR content instantly, perfect for short-term campaigns and promotions.
  • For Complex, Long-Term Projects:
    A native mobile app is more suitable for projects that demand advanced features, higher performance, or offline functionality. This is especially true for applications that require detailed user interactions or must integrate deeply with device hardware.
  • Budget Considerations:
    WebAR's lower development and maintenance costs make it an attractive choice for smaller businesses or experimental projects with limited budgets. Conversely, companies with the resources to invest in a comprehensive user experience may find that native apps justify the higher costs with superior engagement and retention.
  • User Demographics:
    Understanding your audience is key. If your users are tech-savvy and accustomed to downloading apps, the additional steps required for a native app might not be a barrier. However, if you’re targeting a broader or less tech-oriented audience, the simplicity of WebAR can lead to higher overall engagement.


Case Studies and Industry Insights


Retail and E-commerce


Retail brands have increasingly turned to both WebAR and mobile apps to enhance the shopping experience. For instance, some brands use WebAR for virtual try-ons directly on their websites, allowing users to see how products like glasses, makeup, or clothing might look in real time. This frictionless approach boosts conversion rates and enhances customer satisfaction. In contrast, more established brands with robust mobile apps leverage AR to create interactive store experiences, blend online and offline interactions, and offer personalized shopping recommendations.


Education and Training


In the education sector, WebAR is emerging as a tool for delivering interactive content in classrooms without requiring students to install new software. Meanwhile, mobile apps with AR capabilities are used in professional training simulations, where detailed, high-quality visuals and offline access are crucial. Both approaches have their place, and the choice often comes down to whether the priority is ease of access or feature-rich interactions.


Entertainment and Gaming


The gaming industry has long benefited from mobile apps' advanced capabilities, as seen with popular AR games that provide immersive, location-based experiences. However, experimental WebAR games are gaining traction as a way to attract casual gamers who might be deterred by the commitment of downloading an app. The success of these experiences demonstrates that each platform can excel in different scenarios.


Future Trends in AR Technology


As AR technology continues to evolve, the gap between WebAR and native mobile apps may narrow. Innovations in web standards, increased browser capabilities, and cloud computing advancements will likely enhance WebAR’s performance. Meanwhile, improvements in cross-platform development tools may reduce the cost and complexity associated with native app development. Both platforms are expected to coexist, each serving distinct needs within an increasingly connected digital ecosystem.


Developers are also exploring hybrid models that combine the immediacy of WebAR with the robustness of mobile apps. These solutions might offer users the best of both worlds: quick, link-based access and deeper, more personalized experiences when needed.


Schedule a Demo

Conclusion


Both WebAR and mobile apps offer compelling advantages for delivering augmented reality experiences, yet they are designed for different purposes. WebAR’s ease of access, cost-effectiveness, and cross-platform compatibility make it ideal for marketing, viral campaigns, and situations where a rapid, frictionless experience is key. On the other hand, mobile apps excel when performance, advanced features, and offline functionality are required, making them well-suited for long-term projects and sophisticated interactions.


When choosing between the two, consider your target audience, project goals, budget constraints, and the complexity of the desired AR interactions. By understanding the key differences, pros, and cons outlined in this article, businesses and developers can make informed decisions that align with their overall strategy.



In summary, whether you opt for WebAR or invest in a fully featured mobile app, augmented reality remains a transformative tool that can significantly enhance user engagement and drive business success. As the technology matures, expect to see even more innovative solutions that blend the strengths of both platforms, ensuring that the future of AR is bright, versatile, and accessible to everyone.


TALK TO A PRO

We're here to bring your brand to life!

Stay Connected with BrandXR

Create Augmented Reality for Free!

Create, Publish, and Measure 3D Augmented Reality Experiences Without Having to Code.

Free Trial
AI-Driven Augmented and Virtual Reality Training and Simulations
By Moody Mattan April 12, 2025
Executive Summary The convergence of artificial intelligence with augmented and virtual reality technologies is revolutionizing corporate training methods across industries. As Fortune 500 companies encounter increasingly complex operational challenges, the strategic implementation of AI-enhanced immersive learning environments presents unprecedented opportunities to accelerate skills development, reduce costs, and enhance performance outcomes. This article examines the current landscape of AI-driven AR/VR training solutions, provides evidence-based ROI analysis, and outlines frameworks for enterprise-scale deployment. The Evolution of Enterprise Training Paradigms Traditional corporate training methodologies have long faced fundamental limitations: scalability constraints, inconsistent delivery, limited personalization, and difficulties in measuring effectiveness. According to research by the Brandon Hall Group, companies spend approximately $1,111 per employee annually on training initiatives. Yet, 70% of employees report forgetting what they've learned within just 24 hours of traditional training sessions. The digital transformation of learning and development has progressed through several distinct phases: Classroom to e-Learning (2000-2010) : The initial shift from in-person instruction to digital content delivery Mobile Learning Revolution (2010-2015) : The rise of on-demand, device-agnostic training content Immersive Learning Emergence (2015-2020) : Early adoption of AR/VR solutions for specialized training scenarios AI-Enhanced Immersive Learning (2020-Present) : The integration of artificial intelligence with immersive technologies to create adaptive, personalized training environments This latest evolution represents a fundamental shift in how organizations approach skills development. McKinsey research indicates that companies implementing AI-driven immersive training solutions are seeing productivity improvements of 30-50% in technical roles and 15-25% in management functions. Understanding the Technology Ecosystem The AI-driven AR/VR training ecosystem comprises several interdependent technological components: Artificial Intelligence Foundations Modern enterprise training solutions leverage multiple AI capabilities: Natural Language Processing (NLP) : Enables conversational interfaces, real-time language translation, and semantic analysis of learner responses Computer Vision : Facilitates environmental mapping, object recognition, and analysis of user movements/actions Machine Learning : Powers adaptive learning algorithms, performance prediction, and personalized content delivery Deep Learning : Enables pattern recognition, complex decision-making simulations, and behavior modeling Immersive Technology Platforms The delivery mechanisms for AI-enhanced training generally fall into three categories: Virtual Reality (VR) : Fully immersive environments requiring specialized headsets (Meta Quest Enterprise, HTC Vive Focus, Microsoft HoloLens) Augmented Reality (AR) : Digital overlays on physical environments, accessible via smartphones, tablets, or specialized glasses Mixed Reality (MR) : Hybrid experiences where physical and digital objects coexist and interact in real-time  Integration Infrastructure Enterprise-grade AI-AR/VR solutions require robust technological foundations: Cloud Computing : Enables processing-intensive AI operations without endpoint hardware limitations Edge Computing : Reduces latency for time-sensitive interactions and enables offline functionality 5G Connectivity : Facilitates higher data throughput for more complex simulations and multi-user experiences Enterprise Integration : APIs and middleware connecting training platforms with HRIS, LMS, and performance management systems
AR Billboards in Entertainment: Promoting Films, Shows, Events
By Moody Mattan April 11, 2025
Introduction In an era of digital saturation, capturing audience attention has become increasingly challenging for entertainment marketers. Augmented Reality (AR) billboards represent a revolutionary leap forward in outdoor advertising, transforming static displays into interactive and immersive experiences that drive engagement and create lasting brand impressions. This technology is especially valuable in the entertainment sector, where generating anticipation and emotional connections with audiences is crucial for successful promotional campaigns. For entertainment companies promoting films, television shows, and live events, AR billboards present an unparalleled opportunity to cut through the clutter, deliver memorable experiences, and encourage organic social sharing. Recent industry data indicates that AR-enhanced outdoor campaigns achieve engagement rates up to five times higher than traditional billboards, with average dwell times increasing from two to three seconds to one to two minutes. This results in substantially improved message retention and brand recall among target demographics. This article explores how innovative AR billboard technology is transforming entertainment promotion by examining successful case studies, implementation strategies, measurement frameworks, and future trends that OOH advertising professionals and entertainment marketers should consider when planning their next campaign. The Evolution of Entertainment Promotion in OOH Advertising Traditional Billboards: Limitations and Challenges Traditional outdoor advertising has long been a staple in entertainment promotion. From Broadway show posters to massive film billboards on Sunset Boulevard, static displays have historically served as visual announcements of upcoming releases. However, these traditional formats face significant limitations: Limited engagement opportunities with passive viewing experiences Inability to showcase the dynamic nature of entertainment content Difficult measurement of actual viewer interaction and engagement Lack of direct response mechanisms for audience action Increasing competition for attention in congested urban environments The entertainment industry thrives on creating immersive experiences and has particularly felt these constraints. Audiences have become more digitally savvy, so their expectations for promotional experiences have also evolved. The AR Billboard Revolution Augmented Reality billboards signify the next frontier in out-of-home (OOH) advertising, overcoming many limitations of traditional formats. AR billboards merge physical displays with digital overlays accessed via smartphones, generating interactive experiences that: Transform passive viewing into active participation Allow audiences to experience elements of entertainment content firsthand Create sharable moments that extend campaign reach organically Provide valuable engagement data for campaign optimization Generate direct response actions like ticket purchases or content streaming For entertainment marketers, AR billboards offer the ability to extend storytelling beyond the confines of traditional media, creating promotional experiences that reflect the immersive nature of the entertainment products themselves. How AR Billboard Technology Works Technical Infrastructure AR billboard campaigns typically operate through a combination of technologies: Physical Billboard Elements - The traditional OOH display serving as the base canvas AR Markers/Triggers - Visual elements on the billboard that activate the AR experience Mobile Application - Either a dedicated app or integration with existing popular AR platforms Cloud-Based Content Management - Systems that store and deliver AR content elements Analytics Infrastructure - Technology that tracks engagement metrics and user behavior The seamless integration of these components creates a unified experience where physical and digital elements complement each other to deliver maximum impact. User Experience Flow The typical user journey for an AR billboard experience includes: Awareness : The viewer notices the physical billboard, which contains visual cues indicating AR capabilities Activation : The viewer launches the required application and points their device at the billboard Engagement : Digital content overlays appear, enabling interactive experiences related to the entertainment property Interaction : The viewer participates in the experience through gestures, movements, or on-screen actions Social Sharing : Compelling experiences prompt users to capture and share content on social platforms Conversion : Call-to-action elements encourage ticket purchases, content streaming, or other conversion goals This flow transforms what would typically be a passive viewing experience into an active engagement opportunity, extending both the time spent with the advertising and the depth of the brand interaction.
Integrating AR Billboards with Social Media Campaigns
By Moody Mattan April 10, 2025
In today's fragmented media landscape, innovative brands are uncovering powerful synergies by linking augmented reality (AR) billboard experiences with strategic social media campaigns. This integration signifies the evolution of out-of-home (OOH) advertising, transforming static billboards into interactive gateways that drive engagement across platforms and generate valuable user-generated content. The Evolution of OOH: From Static to Interactive Traditional billboards have long been anchors in advertising strategies, but they have historically operated as isolated touchpoints. The revolution in out-of-home (OOH) advertising began with digital billboards, yet augmented reality (AR) technology has propelled a significant advancement. Today's AR billboards act as physical portals to digital experiences that can be captured, shared, and amplified across social channels. "AR billboards mark the next frontier in experiential marketing," says Miranda Chen, Chief Innovation Officer at MediaFutures Group. "When thoughtfully integrated with social platforms, these installations can create exponential reach while providing the immersive experiences that consumers now expect." Recent campaigns by brands such as Adidas, Netflix, and Coca-Cola showcase how AR billboards can convert urban environments into shareable moments that reach well beyond physical locations, generating ripple effects across Instagram, TikTok, and more. Key Benefits of the AR Billboard + Social Media Integration 1. Exponential Reach Amplification While traditional billboards reach only those physically present, AR-enabled installations significantly expand their reach when combined with social strategies. The interaction of just one person can potentially connect with thousands or millions when shared on platforms like Instagram or TikTok. The metrics reveal a compelling narrative: According to OOH Analytics Group, AR billboard campaigns that incorporate social media generate 4.7 times more impressions than traditional billboard campaigns alone and see a 342% increase in social sharing compared to standard digital OOH installations. 2. Enhanced Engagement Metrics AR billboards significantly outperform traditional OOH advertising in engagement metrics. While conventional billboards capture an average of 2-3 seconds of attention, interactive AR experiences attract over 30 seconds of active engagement—a tenfold improvement in attention metrics. "When consumers take a moment to engage with an AR billboard and subsequently share that experience, they invest notably more time with the brand compared to any other advertising format," states Jordan Williams, Head of Experience Design at CreativeTech Partners. "This level of voluntary engagement is marketing gold." 3. First-Party Data Collection Perhaps most valuable in today's privacy-focused environment is the opportunity to collect first-party data. When users interact with AR billboards via dedicated apps or web experiences, brands gain valuable insights while building direct consumer relationships. These interactions generate rich behavioral data to inform future campaigns and product development while enabling remarketing opportunities extending the customer journey. 4. User-Generated Content at Scale When executed effectively, AR billboard campaigns become content engines, generating authentic user-created assets that populate social feeds organically. This user-generated content (UGC) carries heightened credibility, representing genuine consumer experiences rather than brand-produced messaging.  "The most successful AR billboard campaigns don't just create spectacle—they create participatory frameworks that make consumers co-creators in the brand narrative," explains Sofia Rodríguez, Social Strategy Director at Momentum Worldwide.
AR Mirrors for Trade Shows and Events: Metrics that Matter
By Moody Mattan April 9, 2025
In today's business world, brands are always looking for exciting ways to grab attention and craft unforgettable experiences at trade shows and corporate events. One standout tool making waves in event marketing is Augmented Reality (AR) mirrors. They offer a fantastic mix of advanced technology and engaging interaction, taking the experience beyond what traditional displays can achieve match. As marketing leaders allocate substantial budgets to advanced technologies, understanding which metrics are truly important becomes essential for measuring ROI and justifying expenses. This article examines the key engagement metrics that should be monitored when deploying AR mirrors at your next major event. What Are AR Mirrors and Why Should Marketers Care? AR mirrors merge digital displays, camera technology, and advanced software to create interactive experiences where attendees see their reflections alongside superimposed digital elements. Unlike traditional AR applications that depend on smartphones or headsets, AR mirrors offer a communal and accessible experience without requiring special equipment from participants. For brands, these installations represent a significant advancement from traditional booth attractions: They create shareable, branded moments without the friction of app downloads They generate data-rich interactions that can be measured and analyzed They accommodate multiple participants simultaneously, increasing engagement efficiency They produce professional-quality content that attendees actively want to share Key Engagement Metrics for AR Mirror Deployments 1. Participation Rate What it measures: The percentage of booth visitors who engage with your AR mirror experience. Why it matters: A low participation rate may indicate positioning issues, unclear signage, or a failure to communicate the value proposition clearly enough to draw people in. Industry benchmark: Top-performing AR mirror installations achieve 65-80% participation among booth visitors, compared to 30-40% for traditional interactive displays. How to improve it: Position your AR mirror in high-traffic areas with clear sightlines. Train staff to actively invite and guide visitors to the experience. Create clear, compelling signage that communicates the experience in 5 words or less. 2. Session Duration What it measures: The average time users spend actively engaging with the AR mirror experience. Why it matters: Longer sessions typically suggest increased engagement and offer greater chances for brand messaging to be recognized. They also generate natural opportunities for sales representatives to start conversations. Industry benchmark: The typical AR mirror session lasts between 2 to 4 minutes, which is significantly longer than the 20 to 30-second average for traditional booth interactions. How to improve it: Develop multi-stage experiences that progress over time. Integrate gamification elements or personalization options to promote deeper exploration. Structure the user flow to naturally enhance engagement through multiple interactions. 3. Content Sharing Rate What it measures: The percentage of participants who share their AR content on social media or via email. Why it matters: Each share extends your brand reach beyond the confines of the event and creates authentic, peer-to-peer endorsement of your brand experience. Industry benchmark: Well-designed AR mirror experiences achieve 50-60% content sharing rates, compared to 5-10% for traditional photo booths. How to improve it: Ensure the generated content is visually striking and unique. Simplify the sharing process to a single tap or email entry. Add branded elements that are subtle but recognizable. Incorporate real-time editing options that empower users to perfect their content before sharing.  4. Data Capture Rate What it measures: The percentage of participants who provide contact information during the experience. Why it matters: Converting anonymous interactions into identifiable leads is essential for post-event follow-up and calculating true ROI. Industry benchmark: Optimized AR mirror experiences achieve 70-85% data capture rates when value exchange is clearly communicated. How to improve it: Create a clear value exchange (e.g., "Share your email to receive your AR experience video"). Integrate data capture seamlessly into the user flow rather than adding it as an afterthought. Use progressive profiling to gather the most critical information first.
By Moody Mattan April 8, 2025
At the intersection of cutting-edge technology and historical conservation lies a powerful new tool for cultural storytelling: augmented reality (AR) murals. These innovative digital overlays are revolutionizing how communities connect with their heritage, offering immersive experiences that transform static historical sites into dynamic, interactive journeys through time. For city planners, public art administrators, education leaders, and museum directors, AR murals represent not just a technological novelty but a transformative approach to historic preservation that engages diverse audiences while safeguarding architectural integrity. The Evolution of Public History: From Plaques to Immersive Experiences Historically, commemorating significant sites relied primarily on physical markers—bronze plaques, interpretive signs, or traditional murals. While these conventional approaches have merit, they face inherent limitations in space, accessibility, and engagement potential, especially for younger generations accustomed to interactive media. Traditional preservation methods often present a static narrative that fails to capture the multidimensional stories behind historical places. Augmented reality changes this paradigm entirely. By layering digital content over physical spaces through smartphones or AR glasses, these installations create what preservation technologist Sarah Martinez calls "a palimpsest of history—where multiple eras can coexist in a single viewing experience." This technological approach allows visitors to witness how streets, buildings, and communities have transformed over decades or centuries without physically altering historic structures. How AR Murals Work: Technology in Service of Heritage AR murals function through a combination of sophisticated technologies working seamlessly together: Geospatial Anchoring : AR experiences are precisely mapped to physical locations using GPS and visual positioning systems. 3D Modeling : Historical buildings, streets, and figures are recreated through detailed digital models. Interactive Storytelling : Narration, historical photographs, and archival documents are integrated into the experience. Accessibility Features : Multiple languages, audio descriptions, and customizable interfaces ensure broad accessibility. When a visitor approaches a designated site, they can easily open a dedicated app on their mobile device or wear AR-enabled glasses. The screen reveals historical overlays on the contemporary environment—perhaps illustrating a street as it appeared in 1920, complete with period-appropriate vehicles and pedestrians. Users can interact with these elements, accessing deeper content or switching between different historical periods. "What makes AR murals particularly valuable is their non-invasive nature," explains Dr. Marcus Jimenez, Director of Digital Innovation at the National Historic Preservation Trust. "Unlike physical alterations that might compromise a building's historical integrity, these digital interventions leave no permanent mark while dramatically enhancing educational impact."
Verizon Augmented Reality Mural
By Moody Mattan April 7, 2025
In today's bustling retail scene, marketing executives are on the lookout for exciting and creative strategies to draw customers into their physical stores and turn casual browsing into delightful purchases. Augmented reality (AR) murals have become fantastic tools for brands eager to craft immersive and shareable experiences that not only increase foot traffic but also enhance in-store conversion rates. This innovative technology is transforming standard retail spaces into vibrant, interactive destinations that engage customers in meaningful ways, crafting unforgettable brand moments that lead to real results for the business results. The Evolution of Retail Experiences The retail industry has undergone a dramatic transformation in recent years. E-commerce growth has put unprecedented pressure on brick-and-mortar locations, compelling marketing leaders to reimagine the physical shopping experience. Today's consumers expect more than just product availability—they seek experiences that seamlessly blend digital innovation with tangible interactions. According to McKinsey research, experiential retail concepts generate 1.5 to 2.2 times more revenue per square foot than traditional retail models. This seismic shift has created an environment where AR murals and similar immersive technologies are no longer experimental—they are becoming essential components of forward-thinking retail strategy. What Are AR Murals? AR murals merge physical artwork with digital overlays that customers can access through their smartphones or tablets. Unlike traditional store displays, these installations create multi-layered experiences that unfold when viewed through an AR-enabled device. These murals typically consist of: A visually striking physical mural or wall installation that stands alone as compelling artwork Digital content that appears when customers scan the mural using a retailer's app or QR code Interactive elements that respond to customer engagement, often incorporating product information, games, social sharing capabilities, or exclusive offers The most effective AR murals serve dual purposes: they enhance the retail environment's aesthetic appeal while simultaneously functioning as powerful conversion tools. The Business Case for AR Murals in Retail For Fortune 1000 marketing executives weighing technology investments, AR murals present a compelling business case with measurable returns: Driving Foot Traffic AR murals create destination-worthy experiences that attract customers specifically seeking to engage with the installation: Social Media Amplification : AR experiences are highly shareable, generating organic social media content that extends reach beyond paid advertising efforts. Data from Snapchat shows AR experiences drive 94% higher conversion rates than standard ads. Press Coverage and Earned Media : Innovative AR installations often generate media coverage, offering valuable third-party endorsement and increasing market awareness—especially when launched with strategic timing or connected to cultural moments. Location-Based Promotion : AR murals can be promoted through geofenced advertising, drawing nearby mobile users into stores with the promise of a unique digital experience. Recent implementations by leading retailers illustrate the traffic-driving potential of these installations. When luxury retailer Burberry unveiled AR-enabled murals in key global locations, they reported a 40% increase in store visits from younger demographics—a notoriously challenging segment to attract to physical retail.  Increasing In-Store Conversions Beyond attracting customers, AR murals significantly impact conversion metrics: Extended Dwell Time : Customers engaging with AR installations spend an average of 7.5 minutes longer in-store than non-engaged visitors. This extended engagement window creates additional opportunities for product discovery and purchase consideration. Personalized Product Interactions : Advanced AR murals can recognize individual users and recommend products based on previous purchases or expressed preferences, creating highly personalized shopping journeys. Gamification of Shopping : AR murals frequently incorporate game elements that incentivize specific customer behaviors, from exploring different store sections to trying on products virtually. Seamless Path to Purchase : The most effective implementations create frictionless connections between AR engagement and purchase opportunities through integrated mobile checkout or guided pathways to relevant products. A 2023 study by Deloitte found that retailers implementing AR experiences saw an average 19% increase in conversion rates and a 27% increase in average transaction value compared to control stores without such technology.
By Moody Mattan April 4, 2025
Murals have become increasingly popular additions to both residential and commercial spaces. A well-executed mural can transform a bland wall into a captivating focal point, tell your brand's story, or simply bring joy to those who view it. However, finding and hiring the right mural artist for your specific project can be challenging. This comprehensive guide will walk you through hiring the best mural artist for your needs, ensuring your vision comes to life exactly as you imagined. Understanding the Value of Professional Mural Artists Before diving into the hiring process, it is essential to understand what distinguishes professional mural artists from amateur painters or general contractors. Professional mural artists possess specialized skills, experience, and a creative vision that can transform your project from ordinary to extraordinary. Technical Expertise Professional mural artists possess technical skills honed through years of practice and formal training. They understand color theory, composition, perspective, and scale—all essential elements in creating artwork on large surfaces. Their expertise ensures that your mural will appear proportionate and visually appealing, regardless of the viewing angle or distance. Durability and Longevity Experienced mural artists understand which materials and techniques will ensure that your mural endures over time. They choose suitable paints for both indoor and outdoor applications, thoroughly prepare surfaces, and apply protective coatings when needed. This expertise ensures that your investment remains vibrant and intact for years. Creative Problem-Solving Every wall presents unique challenges—unusual dimensions, architectural features, lighting conditions, or surface textures. Professional mural artists can adapt their designs to work with (rather than against) these elements, turning potential obstacles into creative opportunities. Defining Your Mural Project Goals Before you begin your search for the perfect mural artist, clearly define your goals for the project. Purpose of the Mural Consider the primary function of your mural: Is it meant to reinforce your brand identity? Will it serve as a landmark or wayfinding tool? Is it purely decorative or meant to evoke specific emotions? Does it need to communicate a particular message or story? Style Preferences Murals come in countless styles, ranging from photorealistic to abstract, illustrative to typographic. Explore various mural styles and pinpoint the ones that resonate with your vision. Having examples of styles you appreciate will help convey your expectations to potential collaborators artists. Budget Considerations Mural costs vary widely based on factors like size, complexity, location, and artist experience. Establishing a realistic budget range early in the process will help you find artists who can work within your financial parameters.  Timeline Requirements Quality murals take time to plan and execute. Consider your timing needs: Do you need the mural completed by a specific date (e.g., before a grand opening)? Are you flexible on timing to accommodate a sought-after artist's schedule? Will weather conditions affect your timeline for outdoor murals?
Top 10 Mural Trends Shaping Public Art in 2025
By Moody Mattan April 3, 2025
In the evolving landscape of urban aesthetics, public murals continue to shift from simple decorative elements into powerful vehicles for storytelling, community engagement, and brand messaging. As we progress through 2025, the convergence of technology, sustainability, and social consciousness is transforming how we conceptualize, create, and engage with public art. Whether you are a muralist, a public art commissioner, an OOH advertising executive, or a marketing leader seeking innovative brand expression, grasping the current trends can help you maximize the impact of your next mural project. 1. Interactive and Immersive Augmented Reality Murals Perhaps the most exciting development in the mural space is the mainstream adoption of augmented reality (AR) integration. Static walls are now portals to dynamic digital experiences, creating multilayered storytelling opportunities that engage viewers on both physical and virtual planes. Augmented Reality (AR) murals are revolutionizing public engagement by allowing viewers to point their smartphones at a mural and witness its transformation—characters move, narratives unfold, and additional content emerges. This technology has evolved significantly in recent months, with advancements in spatial anchoring that ensure AR elements stay perfectly aligned with the physical artwork, regardless of viewing angle or distance. For brands and marketers, AR murals provide unprecedented metrics and engagement data, offering insights into how audiences interact with the artwork. Companies such as PepsiCo and Nike have leveraged this technology to create memorable campaigns that enhance the impact of their OOH investments while collecting valuable consumer interaction data. Key developments in this space include: Persistent AR experiences that multiple users can access simultaneously Geofenced content that changes based on time of day or special events Interactive elements that respond to viewer gestures or social media actions Integration with social platforms allowing for instant content sharing Payments built directly into AR experiences to easily one-click buy Viewing AR Murals through new AR glasses from Meta and Snapchat 2. Projection Mapping and Dynamic Murals While traditional painted murals remain predominant, projection mapping technology has developed to enable dynamic, changing murals that transform throughout the day or in response to various inputs. These "living walls" preserve the scale and public nature of murals while introducing temporal dimensions that static paintings cannot achieve. Recent advances in projection technology have made these installations more energy-efficient and visible even in daylight conditions. Sony and Epson have developed specialized projectors specifically for public art applications, enabling longer-term installations without excessive power consumption.  Noteworthy applications include: Seasonal narrative shifts that evolve throughout the year Weather-responsive projections that change based on local conditions Traffic or noise-responsive installations that reflect urban rhythms Scheduled transformations that create appointment viewing experiences These dynamic murals are particularly effective for areas with high repeat traffic, as they provide new experiences for regular viewers.
Advances in OOH Advertising Technology: A Chronological Review
By Moody Mattan April 2, 2025
Introduction Out-of-Home (OOH) advertising – encompassing billboards, transit signs, and digital displays – has experienced a remarkable technological evolution since the internet's emergence in the early 1990s. As consumers became increasingly connected online, the traditionally static OOH medium began incorporating digital capabilities to maintain its relevance and effectiveness. This research report, directed at OOH advertising executives and Fortune 1000 marketing leaders, chronicles key advancements in OOH technology in the U.S. (with global comparisons) over the past few decades. It emphasizes high-level trends and widely adopted technologies, including digital billboards, programmatic digital OOH (DOOH) buying, geolocation and mobile integrations, data-driven targeting, augmented/virtual reality (AR/VR) enhancements, improved measurement and attribution, and the growing role of artificial intelligence (AI). The objective is to illustrate how OOH advertising has evolved from static posters into a dynamic, data-driven channel, while providing insight into the industry's future direction headed. 1990s: Laying the Groundwork in a Connected World In the 1990s, the rise of the Internet did not immediately change the predominantly analog nature of out-of-home (OOH) advertising, but it laid the groundwork for future innovation. During this era, OOH advertising in the U.S. was still dominated by static billboards, posters, and transit signage. The decade witnessed ongoing investment in traditional formats (such as vinyl billboards replacing paper for enhanced durability) and iconic illuminated signs (like the neon-lit billboards in Times Square). While OOH remained a physical medium , the emerging digital revolution suggested new possibilities. Initial digital signage experiments began to appear in high-traffic areas—for instance, electronic displays in locations like Times Square and Las Vegas—but these were custom installations rather than widespread advertising networks. The OOH industry acknowledged the Internet’s potential to facilitate remote content control and data sharing , even though the technology was not yet prepared for mainstream use. By the late 1990s, companies were investigating how new digital display technologies (like LED screens) and internet connectivity could eventually be applied to billboards. These early endeavors set the stage for the digital out-of-home revolution that would unfold 2000s. Early 2000s: The Advent of Digital Billboards The early 2000s marked a pivotal turning point as digital billboards made their entrance, fundamentally transforming out-of-home (OOH) advertising. Breakthroughs in LED display technology and reduced electronics costs reached a tipping point around 2000, suddenly making large-format digital screens economically viable for outdoor use. In 2001, Lamar Advertising installed the industry’s first large digital billboard, a low-resolution LED display in Baton Rouge, Louisiana; this groundbreaking pilot demonstrated the concept’s potential. Over the next few years (2001–2004), major OOH companies trialed digital displays in select markets, refining the technology and demonstrating a return on investment. By 2004–2005, costs had decreased and reliability improved to the point that digital billboards entered a phase of rapid growth , with manufacturers shipping dozens of units per week to meet demand demand. These LED billboards offer several advantages over traditional static signs. They are bright, eye-catching, and visible even in daylight, allowing multiple ads to rotate in the same location and multiplying revenue opportunities for operators. For advertisers, digital screens provide flexibility that was previously unheard of in traditional out-of-home (OOH) advertising—content can be updated remotely in real-time, eliminating the costs and delays associated with replacing printed vinyl. By the late 2000s, major U.S. cities and highways were dotted with digital billboards, enabling advertisers to experiment with creative digital content, such as animated visuals or countdown clocks, to better engage passersby. This trend was mirrored globally in other markets, from the bright digital facades of Tokyo and London to the digital screens in emerging markets, although the U.S. remained a leading adopter. Consequently, OOH ad spending began to shift toward digital formats. (As a reference point, global OOH advertising revenue was approximately $30 billion in 2017 and continued to grow, with over 25 million digital OOH units deployed worldwide by 2018.) Today, in the U.S., roughly one-third of all OOH ad spending is on digital formats, reflecting how quickly digital billboards have become a cornerstone of the industry. Late 2000s: Networking, Geolocation and Mobile Integration As digital screens proliferated in the late 2000s, the focus shifted to connecting OOH with the mobile revolution . The introduction of smartphones (after 2007) and widespread mobile internet access created new opportunities to link outdoor ads with consumers’ devices. OOH operators began equipping digital signage with network connections and software to enable more sophisticated content control, scheduling, and targeting. By leveraging live data feeds, billboards could start to display contextually relevant messaging – for example, showing weather-specific ads (such as a coffee ad on a cold morning) or real-time information like news and sports scores. This period also saw OOH campaigns encouraging viewers to engage via their phones. Simple integrations emerged: SMS short codes on billboards to request more information, or the appearance of QR codes and social media handles on OOH posters. Such tactics bridged physical ads with digital engagement, foreshadowing deeper mobile integration to come. A major development was the use of geolocation and geofencing to enhance the impact of out-of-home (OOH) advertising. By leveraging the GPS capabilities of smartphones and location data, advertisers discovered they could retarget individuals exposed to OOH ads with follow-up advertisements on their mobile devices. In practice, this involved setting up virtual perimeters—known as "geofences"—around OOH units: when a user’s phone entered that area, it could trigger a relevant mobile ad or later determine if that user visited a store. By the end of the decade, early adopters were combining OOH and mobile campaigns to increase engagement. For instance, an outdoor billboard could be synchronized with in-app ads, ensuring that audiences received a coordinated message on their phones after viewing the billboard. This convergence of OOH and mobile advertising significantly improved measurability and targeting in what was previously an untrackable medium. Industry research indicated that mobile click-through rates rose substantially (with some studies reporting increases of 15% or more) when supported by OOH ads, thanks to these retargeting methods. Location data from carriers, apps, and sensors became “the secret sauce,” providing insights into audience movement and enabling OOH to approach one-to-one marketing. By 2010, the OOH industry was actively welcoming mobile integration, paving the way for the data-driven era of the 2010s. 2010s: The Rise of Programmatic and Data-Driven DOOH The 2010s represented a transformative decade for OOH advertising, as digital technology, data, and automation converged to establish a genuinely smart medium. By the early 2010s, a substantial number of digital billboards and place-based digital screens (located in malls, transit hubs, airports, etc.) were operational. This laid the foundation for programmatic Digital Out-of-Home (pDOOH) – the implementation of automated, data-driven ad buying for OOH inventory – similar to the changes already seen in online advertising. Around 2012, the first programmatic OOH platforms and exchanges were launched, allowing advertisers to buy digital billboard space via demand-side platforms (DSPs) and real-time bidding algorithms. Companies like Broadsign (in Canada) and Vistar Media (in the U.S.) led the way in connecting digital signage networks to programmatic buying systems. This development enabled marketers to log into a platform, set targeting parameters (location, time, audience demographics, budget), and automatically have their ads displayed on digital billboards across various operators. By the mid-2010s, programmatic DOOH gained traction, with major OOH networks making their inventory available for real-time, impression-based advertising buying. Crucially, data became the lifeblood of OOH campaigns during the 2010s. Advertisers began utilizing a wealth of data sources to target OOH ads more precisely and contextually. Location data, aggregated from mobile devices, enabled brands to choose billboard locations based on the movements and demographics of the audience passing by. Advertisers could also schedule content according to factors like the time of day, the day of the week, or even weather and traffic conditions. For example, a fast-food chain could display coffee ads on digital screens during the morning rush and switch to dinner promotions by late afternoon, or a retailer could trigger ads for raincoats on a billboard when meteorological data indicates rain in that area. This data-driven flexibility introduced a level of targeting and timeliness to OOH that was previously unattainable. One industry report referred to this period as a “data-driven revolution,” highlighting that programmatic ad platforms enabled OOH campaigns to target audiences with precision based on location, time, and weather, just as easily as online ads Another significant advancement was in measurement and attribution . Historically, out-of-home (OOH) advertising was challenging to measure; advertisers relied on traffic counts or surveys to estimate impressions. During the 2010s, new tools emerged to quantify and link OOH audience exposure to outcomes. Mobile location data played a crucial role: if a user’s device was detected (anonymously) within view of a billboard and later appeared inside an advertiser’s store, that movement could be attributed to OOH influence. Specialized firms began offering OOH attribution services that tracked increases in store visitation or website visits among those exposed to an outdoor ad. Simultaneously, computer vision technologies made progress—some digital displays were equipped with sensors or cameras to count passersby or even estimate their demographics (gender, age range) by anonymously analyzing imagery. These camera-equipped “smart billboards” could then adjust content to suit the observed audience (e.g., displaying an eyewear ad if many viewers wore glasses) and provide detailed analytics on how many people looked at the screen. Thanks to these data and sensor innovations, by the end of the 2010s, OOH campaigns could deliver advertisers far more granular reports, including impressions, dwell time, and engagement metrics. As a result, OOH joined the omni-channel, ROI-driven digital ecosystem— a significant departure from the one-size-fits-all posters of the past. From a business perspective, these capabilities fueled considerable growth in the DOOH sector. Advertisers invested more budget into OOH, knowing they could target and measure it like their digital ads. Programmatic buying also reduced the barriers to entry, attracting a broader range of advertisers, including small brands, to purchase billboard space in flexible, short-term increments. By 2019, analysts projected programmatic OOH would evolve into a billion-dollar segment, and overall OOH spending was on a steady upswing. Notably, global data indicated that both traditional and digital OOH were expanding, but digital was growing at a faster pace; by the mid-2020s, DOOH accounted for roughly 40% of global OOH revenue. In the U.S., the digital OOH revenue share reached about 30% of total OOH spending by 2023 , recovering from a brief pandemic dip. The 2010s firmly established that the future of OOH would be digital, data-driven, and integrated with the same programmatic infrastructure as online advertising media.
By Moody Mattan April 1, 2025
Executive Summary Augmented Reality (AR) “smart mirrors” are emerging as transformative tools in beauty retail, allowing customers to virtually try on makeup in-store with lifelike realism. Leading beauty retailers and brands—including Sephora, L’Oréal, and Estée Lauder—have launched and expanded AR mirrors to enhance the in-store experience, resulting in significant increases in sales conversion, basket size, and customer engagement. In-store AR mirrors address key issues, such as hygiene concerns, limited trial time, and choice overload, by enabling touchless, rapid try-ons of multiple products. The results are notable: Sephora’s AR mirror trials led to an estimated 31% increase in sales , and AR try-on users demonstrate conversion rates up to 90% higher than those who do not engage. Estée Lauder reports that AR experiences yield 2.5 times higher conversion for lipstick purchases, and Clinique’s AI-driven AR mirror increased basket size by 30% while extending dwell time five-fold . Major U.S. beauty chains are adopting AR mirrors as a strategic tool to drive in-store sales and customer loyalty , with international retailers (e.g., Watsons in Asia) experiencing double-digit sales growth after implementing AR mirror experiences. This executive case study examines the business case for in-store AR mirrors, the technology and ecosystem (key providers and partners), and detailed case studies of Sephora, L’Oréal, and Estée Lauder implementations. It also presents key ROI metrics and practical considerations for retail leaders looking to adopt AR mirrors. The evidence indicates AR mirrors are evolving from novelty to an essential part of an omnichannel beauty strategy , merging the convenience of digital try-ons with the tangible services of physical retail to enhance both customer satisfaction and profitability. The Business Case for AR Mirrors For beauty retailers, the in-store AR mirror offers an innovative solution to a longstanding challenge: how to enable customers to confidently try and buy cosmetics with minimal friction. Traditional in-store sampling has limitations — applying and removing multiple products is time-consuming and raises hygiene concerns. AR mirrors address this issue by allowing shoppers to “try on” numerous shades virtually in seconds , without ever touching their face. This establishes a safe and sanitary try-on process , a priority heightened by the pandemic. When testers were removed from many stores in 2020, AR mirrors and virtual try-on tools became essential alternatives, significantly accelerating the adoption of the technology. From a business perspective, AR mirrors drive sales by enhancing customer confidence and encouraging exploration. By visibly “wearing” a new lip color or eyeshadow through AR, customers can discover products they might not have previously considered — effectively expanding their basket . Sephora found that AR experiences foster impulse purchases: its virtual mirror convinced shoppers to buy items they hadn’t initially planned on. The interactive and enjoyable nature of AR also keeps shoppers in the store longer, which generally correlates with higher spending. Industry reports indicate that immersive technology like AR can significantly increase dwell time in retail. In one instance, a beauty AR experience resulted in an average in-store dwell time of over 4 minutes , far exceeding typical engagements. Longer engagement provides more opportunities for associates to upsell and for customers to add items to their cart baskets. Critically, AR mirrors address the “try-before-you-buy” expectation of modern consumers. Over 50% of consumers desire augmented shopping experiences to assist in product selection. By meeting this demand, retailers boost sales in the short term and cultivate brand loyalty. Shoppers view the brand as innovative and customer-centric. The novelty factor of AR mirrors — essentially a magic mirror that instantly showcases new looks — also creates buzz and foot traffic. Executives observe that these tech-driven experiences result in memorable store visits that attract shoppers, despite the convenience of online options. From a financial ROI perspective, multiple data points highlight the business case. Shopify reported that products featuring AR content experienced a 94% higher conversion rate than those without. Perfect Corp (a leading AR provider) commissioned a study revealing that AR try-on use made shoppers 1.6× more likely to purchase and to spend 2.7× more on cosmetics . In other words, AR-driven trials lead to higher conversion rates and increased average order values. These gains can directly enhance same-store sales. Beauty giant L’Oréal estimates that augmented reality and AI initiatives contributed to its e-commerce and in-store sales growth (52% e-commerce growth in 2019) by facilitating more personalized, confident purchases at scale. In summary, AR mirrors align with core retail KPIs: increasing conversion, basket size, dwell time, and customer satisfaction, all of which ultimately drive revenue and profitability. Technology Overview AR mirrors combine augmented reality software, cameras, and display screens in a fixture resembling a vanity mirror or digital kiosk. At the core is real-time facial tracking and rendering technology: a camera captures the customer’s face, and AR software overlays ultra-realistic 3D images of makeup (lipstick, eyeshadow, foundation, etc.) onto the live video feed. Unlike simple 2D photo filters, advanced AR mirrors utilize 3D facial geometry and AI to simulate how products appear from different angles and under various lighting. For example, ModiFace, a pioneer in beauty AR, calibrates its rendering by analyzing how makeup looks on models of different skin tones and lighting conditions, yielding a highly lifelike result. The goal is a virtual application that is nearly indistinguishable from real makeup application. Early augmented reality (AR) mirrors were essentially large screens or tablets that ran AR try-on software. Sephora’s first installations between 2014 and 2016 featured 3D AR mirrors co-developed with ModiFace, which included a camera and screen housed in a vanity-like frame. Today’s implementations vary from full-length smart mirrors to iPad-based kiosks found at beauty counters. For example, the AR mirror launched by MAC Cosmetics in 2017 is a freestanding screen that maps the user’s face 30 times per second, realistically overlaying 30 different eye makeup looks. Other setups, such as Charlotte Tilbury’s “Magic Mirror,” utilize a mirror-shaped display with built-in lighting, evoking the ambiance of a glamorous vanity Crucially, the tech has evolved to require no learning curve from shoppers: no app download or menu navigation is needed . Users simply stand in front of the mirror and see themselves with virtual makeup; the interface often lets them change shades with a simple gesture or tap, or even automatically recommends a look. Keeping the experience seamless is key to encouraging engagement, as noted by AR developers who avoid complex UIs to make mirrors universally inviting . Behind the scenes, AR providers and tech partners create an ecosystem that enables these mirror experiences. In the beauty industry, several specialists stand out (see Table 1). ModiFace , acquired by L’Oréal in 2018, supplies AR and AI technology for makeup try-ons across many of L’Oréal’s 36 brands and has previously collaborated with Sephora and others. Perfect Corp. , the maker of the YouCam Makeup app, offers a turnkey AR mirror solution used by retailers such as Ulta and Watsons; it features patented AgileFace® tracking for high accuracy. Agencies like Holition develop custom AR mirror experiences for luxury brands (e.g., Charlotte Tilbury) with tailored hardware and content. Newer startups (e.g., BrandXR ) concentrate on pop-up AR installations for brands (as seen with Valentino Beauty and Makeup by Mario mirrors). These providers offer features ranging from virtual product try-ons to shade finders and integrated purchase functions (scanning a QR code from the mirror to add the product to the cart). Table 1 compares some leading AR mirror solutions and their notable brand deployments: Table 1. Leading In-Store AR Mirror Solution Providers and Deployments
Show More
Share by: